Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Another reason to dislike Sarah Palin
And on gays, Governor Palin said: “But what you’re talking about, I think, value here, what my position is on homosexuality and you can pray it away, because I think that was the title that was listed on that bulletin. And you know, I don’t know what prayers are worthy of being prayed. I don’t know what prayers are going to be asked and answered. But as for homosexuality, I am not going to judge Americans and the decisions that they make in their adult personal relationships. I have one of my absolute best friends for the last 30 years happens to be gay, and I love her dearly. And she is not my “gay friend,” she is one of my best friends, who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice I would have made. But I am not going to judge people.”
Excuse me, Mrs. Palin but I didn't choose to be gay (not that if someone were to "choose" being gay there would be anything wrong with that...we are fabulous). I was born gay just like you were apparently born with limited capacity for knowledge.
I'm sorry, what?
To set the scene, Sherri is a devout Christian that was "saved" in recent years. She gave an interview in a Christian magazine saying she "had more abortions that [she] would like to count" prior to finding Jesus. She also "doesn't know" if the world is flat. During a discussion about Epicurus, she argued with Whoopi and Joy saying that Christians pre-date the BC philosopher. It's no secret that I'm not a religious person, and I certainly don't judge anyone who does have faith. I should say I don't judge most people that have faith. What Ms. Shepherd has is a case of faith turned insanity. Much of what she vehemently defends has already been disproven.
- The world is not flat -- that much is pretty clear, no? To anyone that isn't blind and has an understanding of basic shapes? I'll bet if I had asked the little boy that was sitting behind me today on the train what shape the Earth was, he'd get the answer right. He's learning shapes in school right now.
- B.C. stands for "before Christ". That means if someone was born in 341 B.C., they certainly predate Christ and His teachings.
- These are just two of her ravings. I'm sure I'll find more. I won't promise to point them out since this post has already made me exasperated.
The clip below is Sherri talking about how Sarah Palin being a mother of five qualifies her to be Vice President (and potentially President) of the United States. Really? That's what it takes, huh? My Mom is one of six kids, and I don't plan to nominate my grandmother to run for public office. I have a great deal of respect for parents, and I may even be one someday. But that doesn't mean I'm going to be qualified to run for public office. I'm not suggesting that this is the only argument that Sherri can make re: Palin's qualifications, but she needs to stop using this one.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/sherri-shepherd-palins-fi_n_123281.html
Not surprisingly, she doesn't believe in evolution either... aaaaaaand I'm spent. I need to go read a book.
Monday, September 29, 2008
Can't we all just get along?

So I've noticed that there is some tension going down on the blog. And so I'm gonna go all Edna Garrett on this blog's ass. "GURRRRLS! GURRRLS!" (and guys)... can we agree to disagree on some things and keep it civil? Thanks!
Now I know that this blog has a very liberal slant. And right now is a touchy time with an election only weeks away. But that doesn't mean that we can't get along. Some of my best friends are conservatives. I disagree with them regularly. But an incident with my very conservative family at the start of the Iraq War involving e-mail forwards and responses taught me how sticky politics is - especially amongst friends and family. So while I'm not calling for an end to ideological slant to this blog or any comments, let's not get personal or slanderous. Not that it's been that bad but I know things can deteriorate as quickly as Rush Limbaugh's OxyContin high (oh, I couldn't resist).
It's either we all get along or I'm going to make you paint your bedroom in a ploy to get you to work things out. And we all know that will end in messy hilarity!

Fashion Critique of the Candidates
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/galleries/frontrunners
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Thoughts on the Debate
is McCain deaf in his left ear? He never looked at Senator Obama. At best, it made him seem old and deaf, at worst, it made him seem dismissive and rude.
every answer of McCain's involved his opponent. Defensive, much? I imagine if I were undecided I would have been put off by it. It just made McCain seem petty and like he was avoiding representing his own ideas.
Also, what is with Republicans being so snotty and condescending (see debate tonight and their entire convention).
I don't know. I feel like I got more substantive info from Barack Obama. At different times when McCain was speaking, I kept thinking he sounded like a sedated Kasey Kasem.
Friday, September 26, 2008
Ooooh, BURN!
...people who constructively engaged in the process were castigated in the Republican Caucus by people who aren't here a lot, at least a person who isn't here a lot of time..."
Now I am REALLY Scared
Crab on a Jellyfish
Volunteering
I spoke with a Hillary supporter who had "no idea" who she's going to vote for. I asked her what her concerns are and she said the economy. I asked her who she thought would best handle the economic problems we're facing. "Oh, Obama for sure" We kept talking, but I think it made her realize that neither candidate is perfect, but you exercise your vote with the faith that the person you vote for will do the best job.
I also spoke with someone who enthusiastically answered "Oberack" to my question. Me: "uuuuhhh... do you mean Barack Obama?" Her: "*laughing* I can't say the guy's name, but you know who I mean!" (funny especially since I told her I was a volunteer with the Barack Obama campaign in Colorado. She might have also been the one who asked, "Who's that?" hahahaha--oh, PEOPLE!)
Conservative Racist Bastards
Dave put together this blog post after seeing news stories on the subject below.
Jenn,
There is a new conservative meme out there trying to explain the financial meltdown on, get this... black folks.
Yes, you read that correctly. The poorest segment of the American population has apparently outwitted America's great financial institutions, and took them for all their worth.
This is the new talking point initiated by Neil Cavuto at Faux News. A few days ago, he suggested that giving home mortgages to minorities was the underlying problem. Since the same argument was parroted by both Laura Ingram and John Stossel this evening, discussed at length by the ultra-conservative Investor's Business Daily, and traceable to a Cato Institute rag from January 2008, I thought I ought to look into the matter a bit.
The argument suggests that the Community Reinvestment Act (first passed in 1977, and strengthened in 1995) is responsible for much of the crisis because it supposed "empowered banking regulators to punish banks which do not lend to the poor and minorities at the level that Obama's fellow community organizers would like." Banks were thus given "numerical quotas," which made our powerful financial corporations quake in their boots. Oh no, Big Gummit is comin' to town. And so, the argument goes, "loans started being made on the basis of race, and often little else"
(Pause for laughter and ridicule.)
What was the result? According to conservatives, them minorities just jumped into the market and diluted all our good mortgages with their own bad juju. Since those ingrates refuse to pay back their loans, good white folk are left high and dry.
Here are a few useful and brief responses:
1) "Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaa! What a joke. Oh my god, you CAN'T be serious!"
2) "Black folks owned 9% of the homes in 1994. Eleven years later, they owned the exact same percentage. So there really wasn't any huge racial disparity. And if there wasn't a huge racial disparity, you can't really blame blacks can you? Sorry, no."
3) "Of the subprime loans, only 20% were connected with the Community Revitalization Agency. In other words, 80% of these 'bad' loans had little to no connection to the agency you said caused this thing. Now don't you feel silly?"
4) "If risky loans were a problem, why did Bush change FHA rules in 2005 to allow the government to provide federally-backed, zero-money-down loans for the first time ever? Man, that would have been exceedingly dumb."
5) "The loans themselves aren't the problem; the problem is what happened after the loans were made. Thanks to new rules, loans were swapped and resold dozens of times over, and that's how $1 trillion in subprime loans become a $40 trillion house of cards."
6) "The financial industry earned $3.5 trillion in profits from 1995 to 2007, yet now cry about $2 billion in potentially-bad loans. Since all those profits went in their pockets, shouldn't the bailout come from the same place?"
Oh, those crazy Republicans. They sure know how to divert attention, play on racial stereotypes, and stick their snouts into the public trough, don't they? They'll tell you that the market is king and government should stay out of it, but when those salad days end, they're first in line for a handout. Instead of "trickle down" economics, we just get to "trickle up" our tax dollars.And then magically, the government should just stay out of the market again.
I say no! No to the Wall Street bailout, and yes to helping borrowers and ordinary folks as needed. We really don't need to pay the fat cats first, or listen to claptrap about deregulation. Greed can be both helpful and doleful, which is why regulations are essential for a well-ordered market that serves society.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
McCain campaign meltdown
Perhaps 2 things will go down in history as the beginning of the end for the McCain / Palin ticket: McCain canceling his appearance on Letterman and Palin's interview with Katie Couric.
I will pretty much let the clips speak for themselves. First, Letterman. If you haven't seen this, you must.
Some of my favorite things that Letterman said:
"Are we suspending [our campaign] because there is an economic crisis or because our poll numbers are sliding?" To which the audience responds with "Oooooohhhh!" and Paul Schaffer says, "Oops! Oops oops!"
"And let's say there's a time of crisis...and then Sarah Palin takes over as president, well she ought to be ready because she's handled crises like this in the past...oh wait a minute, she really hasn't handled a crisis like this in the past."
And the interview of Sarah Palin with Katie Couric speaks for itself. Here is the worst of it - what will go down in history as "the Russia question":
I am blown away by how...DUMB she sounds. I almost feel sorry for her because I think the McCain campaign really wanted to beef up her foreign policy credentials and they've made her tout the Russia thing even though it sounds SO STUPID.
Goodbye, John McCain & Sarah Palin. Thanks for the blog fodder.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Joining the Apple revolution

Monday, September 22, 2008
Some things you should know re: previous post
Sunday, September 21, 2008
The second day the music died

Tuesday, September 16, 2008
My Crush on Michelle
Here is the intro to the show--it's really cute:
Apt
"there is no sustainable political/military power without economic power, and talking about one without the other is nonsense. Unless we make America the country most able to innovate, compete and win in the age of globalization, our leverage in the world will continue to slowly erode. Those are the issues this election needs to be about, because that is what the next four years need to be about."
You can read the entire article here.
Getting it Together
Saturday, September 13, 2008
My electoral map
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008/pick-your-president/3907/
OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA!!



